![]() |
||||||||||
|
|
+/-2 standard deviations actually spans 95.44% of the probability. But rules of thumb are only approximations and are meant to be convenient and memorable. 96% is close and it is easily divided by two, so we'll use 96%.
For example... If a mutual fund had a mean annual return of 12% and a standard deviation of returns of 15% for the past ten years, each of the ten annual returns used to compute the mean would be a data point and the standard deviation of returns would be computed from the ten data points. 68% of the data points would be expected to be within one standard deviation of the mean, 96% within two standard deviations and virtually 100% within three standard deviations. There is a 68% probability that a data point selected at random will have a value of 12% +/-15%, which spans the range form -3% and +27%. This also can be interpreted as there being a 34% probability (68% ÷ 2) of the return being between -3% and +12%, and a 34% probability of the return being between +12% and +27%. Similarly, There is a 96% probability that the return will be between -18% and +42%, and nearly a 100% probability that the return will be between -33% and +57%. And the same logic applies to the probabilities to one side or the other of the mean. Following this logic, the probabilities can be taken in steps. As the mean splits the total probability, half of each of the ranges, 34%, 48% and 50%, respectively, fall on either side of the mean. Therefore, there is a 48% - 34% = 14% probability that the return will be between one and two standard deviations from the mean in both directions, i.e., a 14% probability of being between -3% and -18%, and a 14% probability of being between +27% and +42%. And so on. Conclusion... There's a good reason that they say that past returns are not necessarily an indication of what future returns may be. Statistically, using past returns as a predictor of future returns is unsound due to the randomness of security returns. However, past volatility, as measured by the standard deviation of returns, is considered to be a good predictor of future volatility. Investment returns must be taken in context and the volatility of returns as measured by the standard deviation of returns provides the means for doing this. Use the rules of thumb to assess the risk of individual investments based on their standard deviation of returns. |
|||||||||